Case study 3C Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Case study 3C - subsidization Example3. I guess that people paying for the lottery are mostly aware of the fact that they pay additional taxes if they understand how the state tax system works. Moreover, the amount of cash a somebody pays for a lottery ticket is not that big to create problems for a person spending money on it. The Oregon Lottery was playing on some kind of local patriotism do its customers believe that buying lottery will contribute to the development of the state and this claim was unethical because it was altogether partially true.4. Brands often make denote statements exaggerating social occasions and emphasizing something that is scarce half true. Oregon Lottery was utilize a deceitful tool for attracting clients, and their approach can hardly be called ethical.1. Creative vagueness in statements is use to attract customers as in most cases there is a range of brands similar in their characteristics, and it is only advertising that can persuade a custo mer choose one product over another. However, if the training about the products would be as precise as facts in the news that could be very recyclable for consumers.3. The response of Oregon Lottery on the accusation of Politifacts.com was as vague their advertising private road they decide to mothball this 97 percent but claimed that they decided to stick to it nevertheless. It would be more optimal to bequeath public with facts and figures proving truthfulness of their statements.1. I suppose that lottery can easily serve as a means of support of public education as any other legal business. The only thing is that consumers must be fully aware how much and why they are paying for.2. An ethical campaign for a local lottery must first of all use truthful statements in advertising campaign. The possibility of financial profit can serve as a motto for the company as it is its primary goal. Moreover, the